Table of Contents

Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY)

Variants and Alternative Names

Context

Principle Statement

“Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.”1)

Description

DRY not only states that code duplication shall be avoided. Rather DRY is a general rule that states that if there is duplication, there shall be some “single source of truth”. Also when one piece of information has several representations (like an object structure corresponding to a database schema) DRY demands one and only one representation being the definitive one. The other representations have to be generated automatically. The “one and only” representation can be one of the used representations or alternatively a third one.

Rationale

If there are several representations of the same information (be it code or any other form of information), all of them have to be maintained separately while changing at the same time. There is the danger that at some point in time the different representations diverge which is a fault. But if there is a single source of truth, there is only one place where changes have to be applied. Then the representations cannot diverge.

Strategies

Caveats

See section contrary principles.

Origin

Evidence

Relations to Other Principles

Generalizations

Specializations

Contrary Principles

Complementary Principles

Principle Collections

OOD Principle Language
General Principles
ML KISS MIMC DRY GP RoE
Modularization Principles
MP HC ECV
Module Communication Principles
TdA/IE LC DIP
Interface Design Principles
EUHM PLS UP
Internal Module Design Principles
IH/E IAP LSP PSU

Examples

Description Status

Incomplete

Further Reading

Discussion

Discuss this wiki article and the principle on the corresponding talk page.

1)
Andrew Hunt and David Thomas: The Pragmatic Programmer: From Journeyman to Master; see List of Tips.
2)
Chanchal Kumar Roy and James R. Cordy: A survey on software clone detection research
3)
Elmar Juergens, Florian Deissenboeck, Benjamin Hummel, and Stefan Wagner Do code clones matter?